Neuroscienze Cognitive BEYOND NUMBERS: THE ORIGIN OF SPATIAL ASSOCIATIONS OF ORDINAL INFORMATION

ordinal knowledge in the horizontal segment of the intraparietal sulcus. Journal ofNeuroscience, 27, 8952–8956. Fias, W., van Dijck, J. P., & Gevers, W. (2011). How is number associated withspace? The role of working memory, E. Brannon, S. Dehaene, Editors Space, time, and number in the brain: Searching for evolutionary foundations of mathematical thought(Attention and Performance), Vol. 24 Elsevier Science, Amsterdam, 133–148.Fischer, M. H. (2003). Spatial representations in number processing — evidencefrom a pointing task. Visual Cognition, 10, 493–508. Fischer, M. H., Castel, A. D., Dodd, M. D., & Pratt, J. (2003). Perceiving numberscauses spatial shifts of attention. Nature Neuroscience, 6, 555–556. Fischer, M. H., Warlop, N., Hill, R. L., & Fias, W. (2004). Oculomotor bias induced bynumber perception. Experimental Psychology, 51, 91–97.Fischer, M. H. (2006). The future for SNARC could be stark. Cortex, 42, 1066–1068.Fischer, M. H. (2008). Finger counting habits modulate spatial-numerical associations. Cortex, 44, 386–392.Fischer, M. H., Mills, R., & Shaki, S. (2010). How to cook a SNARC: Number placement in text rapidly changes spatial-numerical associations. Brain & Cognition, 72, 333-336.Fischer, M. H., & Brugger, P. (2011). When digits help digits: spatial–numericalassociations point to finger counting as prime example of embodied cognition. Frontiers inPsychology, 2:260.Foltz, G. S., Poltrock, S. E., & Potts, G. R. (1984). Mental comparison of size and magnitude: Size congruity effects. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory,and Cognition, 10, 442–453. Franklin, M. S., Jonides, J., & Smith, E. E. (2009). Processing of order information fornumbers and months. Memory & Cognition, 37(5), 644–654.Galfano, G, Rusconi, E., & Umiltà, C. (2006). Number magnitude orients attention,but not against one’s will. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 13(5), 869-874. Gathercole, S. E., & Baddeley, A. D. (1990). Phonological memory deficits inlanguage-disordered children: Is there a causal connection? Journal of Memory and Language, 29, 336–360. Gerstmann, J. (1940). Syndrome of finger agnosia, disorientation for right and left,agraphia, and acalculia. Archives of Neurology and Psychiatry, 44, 398–408. Gevers, W., Reynvoet, B., & Fias, W. (2003). The mental representation of ordinalsequences is spatially organized. Cognition, 87, B87–B95.Gevers, W., Reynvoet, B., & Fias, W. (2004). The mental representation of ordinalsequences is spatially organized. Evidence from days of the week. Cortex, 40, 171–172. Gevers, W., Verguts, T., Reynvoet, B., Caessens, B., & Fias, W. (2006). Numbersand space: a computational model of the SNARC effect. Journal of Experimental Psychology Human Perception and Performance, 32, 32–44.Gevers, W., Santens, S., Dhooge, E., Chen, Q., Van den Bossche, L., Fias, W., &Verguts, T. (2010). Verbal-Spatial and Visuospatial Coding of Number–Space Interactions.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 139(1), 180–190. Gibbs, R. W. (2006). Embodiment and Cognitive Science. Cambridge: UniversityPress. Glaser, W. R. (1992). Picture naming. Cognition, 42, 61–105.Gracia-Bafalluy, M., & Noel, M. P. (2008). Does finger training increase numericalperformance? Cortex, 44, 368–375.Hamilton, J. M. E., & Sanford, A. J. (1978). The symbolic distance effect foralphabetic order judgements: A subjective report and reaction time analysis. QuarterlyJournal of Experimental Psychology, 30, 33-42. Herrera, A., Macizo, P., & Semenza, C. (2008). The role of working memory in theassociation between number magnitude and space. Acta Psychologica, 128, 225–237. Hommel, B., Pratt, J., Colzato, L., & Godijn, R. (2001). Symbolic control of visualattention. Psychological Science, 12, 360-365.Hubbard, E. M., Piazza, M., Pinel, P., & Dehaene, S. (2005). Interactions betweennumber and space in parietal cortex. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 6, 435-448. Ifrah, G. (1981). The Universal History of Numbers: From Prehistory to the Inventionof the Computer. London: The Harvill Press. Ifrah, G. (1985). From One to Zero: A Universal History of Numbers. New York:Viking Penguin. Ischebeck, A., Heim, S., Siedentopf, C., Zamarian, L., Schocke, M., Kremser, C.,Egger, K., Strenge, H., Scheperjans, F., & Delazer, M. (2008). Are numbers special?Comparing the generation of verbal materials from ordered categories (months) to numbersand other categories (animals) in an fMRI study. Human Brain Mapping, 29, 894–909. Ishihara, M., Keller, P. E., Rossetti, Y., & Prinz, W. (2008). Horizontal spatialrepresentations of time: evidence for the STEARC effect. Cortex, 44, 454–461. Jordan, N. C., Kaplan, D., Ramineni, C., & Locuniak, M. N. (2008). Development ofnumber combination in skill in the early school years: when do fingers help? DevelopmentalScience, 11, 662–668.Jou, J. (2003). Multiple number and letter comparison: Directionality and accessibility in numeric and alphabetic memories. American Journal of Psychology, 116, 543–579.Kosslyn, S. M., Koenig, O., Barrett, A., & Cave, C. B. (1989). Evidence for two types of spatial representations: hemispheric specialization for categorical and coordinaterelations. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 15(4),723–735.Lindemann, O., Abolafia, J. M., Pratt, J., & Bekkering, H. (2008). Coding strategies innumber space: Memory requirements influence spatial–numerical associations. TheQuarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 61(4), 515–524. Lindemann, O., Alipour, A., & Fischer, M. H. (2011). Finger counting habits in middle-eastern and western individuals: An online survey. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 42(4), 566–578.Loetscher, M., Schwarz, U., Schubiger, M., & Brugger, P. (2008). Head turns biasthe brain’s internal random generator. Current Biology, 18, R60–R62Lorch, R. F., & Myers, J. L. (1990). Regression analyses of repeated measures data in cognition research. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition,16, 149–157. Lotto, L., Dell’Acqua, R., & Job, R. (2001). Le figure PD/DPSS. Norme di accordo sulnome, tipicità, familiarità, età di acquisizione e tempi di denominazione per 266 figure. Giornale Italiano di Psicologia, 28, 193–207.Marshuetz, C., Smith, E. E., Jonides, J., DeGutis, J., & Chenevert, T. L. (2000).Order information in working memory: fMRI evidence for parietal and prefrontal mechanisms.Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 12(2), 130–144. Marshuetz, C. (2005). Order Information in Working Memory: An Integrative Reviewof Evidence From Brain and Behavior. Psychological Bulletin, 131(3), 323–339. Marshuetz, C., & Smith, E. E. (2006). Working memory for order information: Multiplecognitive and neural mechanisms. Neuroscience, 139(1), 195-200.McCloskey, M. (1992). Cognitive mechanism in numerical processing: Evidence fromacquired dyscalculia. Cognition, 44, 107-157. Moyer, R. S., & Landauer, T. K. (1967). Time required for judgements of numericalinequality. Nature, 215, 1519–1520. Müller, D., & Schwarz, W. (2007). Is there an internal association of numbers tohands? The task set influences the nature of the SNARC effect. Memory & Cognition, 35(5),1151–1161.Noël, M. P., & Seron, X. (1992). Notational constraints and number processing: Areappraisal of the Gonzalez and Kolers (1982) study. Quarterly Journal of ExperimentalPsychology: Human Experimental Psychology, 45(A), 451-478. Noël, M. P. (2005). Finger gnosia: A predictor of numerical abilities in children? ChildNeuropsychology, 11, 413–430. Notebaert, W., Gevers, W., Verguts, T., & Fias, W. (2006). Shared spatialrepresentations for numbers and space: the reversal of the SNARC and the Simon effects.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 32, 1197–1207.Nuerk, H. C., Iversen, W., & Willmes, K. (2004). Notational modulation of the SNARC and the MARC (linguistic markedness of response codes) effect. Quarterly Journal ofExperimental Psychology, 57A(5), 835–863. Oldfield, R. C. (1971). The assessment and analysis of handedness: the Edinburghinventory. Neuropsychologia, 9, 97-113. Pesenti, M., Thioux, M., Seron, X., & De Volder, A. (2000). Neuroanatomicalsubtrates of Arabic number processing, numerical comparison and simple addition: a PETstudy. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 12, 461–479.Piazza, M., Izard, V., Pinel, P., Le Bihan, D. & Dehaene, S. (2004). Tuning curves for approximate numerosity in the human intraparietal sulcus. Neuron, 44, 547–555.Pinel, P., Dehaene, S., Rivière, D., & LeBihan, D. (2001). Modulation of Parietal Activation by Semantic Distance in a Number Comparison Task. NeuroImage, 14(5), 1013-1026.Plaisier, M. A., & Smeets, J. B. J. (2011). Number magnitude to finger mapping isdisembodied and topological. Experimental Brain Research, 209, 395–400. Previtali, P., De Hevia, M. D., & Girelli, L. (2010). Placing order in space: the SNARCeffect in serial learning. Experimental Brain Research, 201(3), 599–605. Previtali, P., & Girelli, L. HOW MUCH DO FINGERS COUNT? Directional biases innumber-space association. Submitted.Priftis, K., Zorzi, M., Meneghello, F., Marenzi, R., & Umiltà, C. (2006). Explicit vs.implicit processing of representational space in neglect: Dissociations in accessing themental number line. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 18(4), 680-688.Proctor, R. W., & Cho, Y. S. (2006). Polarity correspondence: a general principle for performance of speeded binary classification tasks. Psychological Bulettin, 132, 416–442.Restle, F. (1970). Speed of adding and comparing numbers. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 95, 437–444.Rinaldi, L., & Girelli, L. (2011). The role of number-space associations inpreschoolers’ numerical competence. Poster presented at the Workshop “Typical andAtypical Neurocognitive Aspects of Numerical Processing”, BeerSheva, Israel, April 10-14. Rusconi, E., Walsh, V., & Butterworth, B. (2005). Dexterity with numbers: rTMS overleft angular gyrus disrupts finger gnosis and number processing. Neuropsychologia, 43,